UK Parliament / Open data

Government of Wales Bill

Proceeding contribution from Nick Ainger (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 27 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bills on Government of Wales Bill.
I am glad that the name of Hugh Rawlings has featured in our debates, because he has been an important member of the Bill team. That team has worked hard over many months to get to where we are today. I want to put on record my gratitude to Mr. Rawlings and all the other members of the Bill team for their excellent work in supporting me and my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State. The reason why we changed from ““business”” to ““proceedings”” is that ““business”” was used to cover the existing Assembly when it was acting as both a legislature and an Executive. The change reflects the separation. When the Assembly acts as a legislature, the term ““proceedings”” will be used, as in Parliament and the Scottish Parliament. ““Business”” will now equal ““proceedings”” plus the Executive functions. I hope that that explains the change, which is basically due to the separation of the Executive from the legislature. We will now use the same sort of terms as we use here.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c93 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top