I am delighted to try and clarify the amendment’s possible implications. This has been an interesting debate, with some good points made, but many hon. Members seem to have misunderstood what is involved in the valuation process. It is to that question that I shall try to address my remarks.
Various Opposition Members adopted a partisan approach, and one accused the Government of being responsible for a ““corruption of power””. I assure the House that the formula is not being manipulated. Interestingly, only one accusation of that sort was made, when the right hon. Member for Suffolk, Coastal (Mr. Gummer) spoke about the allocation of health money and claimed that the pendulum had swung away from the problems of an elderly population and towards health issues. I point out that in areas where people have a lower life expectancy, in general that is due to the incidence of disease and illness. To me, that seems a perfectly reasonable criterion to govern the allocation of money. It certainly does not involve party-political bias.
Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Phil Woolas
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 1 December 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c461-2 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 00:48:02 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282634
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282634
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282634