That is a helpful reply and I shall reflect carefully on what the Minister has said. The obvious rejoinder to it, I suppose, is that a 16 or 17 year-old parent is just as capable as an older person of defying the court order on contact, and why should he or she get away with it? But I take on board the point that the noble Lord made about the vulnerability of parents of that age group. That is undoubtedly correct. No doubt, as he said, this was a finely balanced decision but it is one that will profit from further thought on my part between now and the next stage of the Bill. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Children and Adoption Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Howe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Children and Adoption Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c136GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:36:20 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280678
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280678
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280678