UK Parliament / Open data

Road Safety Bill [HL]

I thank the Minister for his response and, indeed, acceptance of the fact that the amendment is connected to road safety. I admit that I was somewhat surprised when he said that the Department of Trade and Industry is responsible, but I have taken note and I shall approach the noble Lord, Lord Sainsbury, again to ask him to re-examine the issue. I have been on this subject for many years—I have been in this House for 34 years. From time to time I have raised the issue in Bills, Questions and so on, but I have yet to discover any wider interests, except those of party managers. I do not know what those wider interests are. I am a Scottish hill farmer. I was brought up in Ayrshire but my clan comes from further north. I am well aware of the Scottish problem but it is not a problem now. We have electricity and modern farming methods. We are no different from anywhere else, whether it is Stavanger or Reykjavik. We are not in the Middle Ages for heaven’s sake. I am amazed at what the Minister said. I am disappointed and I may wish to come back to the matter when I discover those wider interests. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 163 and 164 not moved.] Clause 43 [Minor corrections]: [Amendments Nos. 165 and 166 not moved.] Clause 43 agreed to [Amendments Nos. 167 and 168 not moved.]
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c1293 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top