Road Safety Bill [HL]

The noble Lord is challenging a different philosophy with regard to guarantees to the public. Heavy goods vehicle driving is a very important skill. He said that straightforward deregulation will achieve the same objectives, but that case has not been made. It is important that we regulate training and make sure that it is effective for such a significant job. We recognise that heavy goods vehicle driving is an important skill in our community. It certainly affects other road users significantly. We consider that our present structure for the supervision, scrutiny and control of such training is necessary. I heard what the noble Lord said about deregulation. We have considered one or two of the amendments that he has tabled on these matters. I have done my best to meet the main arguments that he has put, but we have a difference of philosophy. We do not deny his point about the need for flexibility. That is why these regulations are there. They are to be flexible to take account of developments in industry. We are aware of the rapidity with which change can occur, and we are concerned. The Bill is designed to have an added dimension of flexibility on to those issues. We are not convinced of his main proposition: that we would be better off with a deregulated position. I indicated that when we considered the amendments, and on that basis I commend the clause to the Committee.