I thank the noble Earl, Lord Howe, for raising that point. I recognise its fundamental importance. Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss explores this question in her evidence and it is one that arises again with parenting orders. The idea of imposing on families a duty to attend meetings which, while not by nature medical, go into this difficult area. If these families do not get the professional help they need, they may tear each other apart for years and, in the process, cause harm to their children. On the other hand, one must be careful not to undermine the right of the individual to make their own choices. It may be that a compromise can be reached between the two. Just as there are two assessment sessions for mediation, perhaps there could be a couple of meetings with a relevant professional to explore issues before they go further.
I recognise that the amendment is probing in nature, but I can see why the noble Earl has felt it necessary to express his concern.
Children and Adoption Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Listowel
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Children and Adoption Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c64GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:10:51 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266925
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266925
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266925