It is so helpful to have these arguments thrashed out. The noble Baroness said that ““reasonable contact”” is best. I shall not tire the Committee by giving all the good reasons why it is so important that children have contact with both parents—what it does for their self esteem; what it does if a daughter does not have contact with her father and never gets to know him. Perhaps I may just qualify what the noble Baroness said: there are circumstances where a child has experienced violence from his father in the past and has not been able to recover and forgive the parent for it; or where each parent tells the child each time he sees him how horrible the other parent is; or where the child has never really known that parent. A number of factors weigh against that.
I am sure that the noble Baroness is cognisant of that, but I suspect that with this debate it is important always to highlight both aspects of that. I hope that what I have said has been helpful.
Children and Adoption Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Listowel
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Children and Adoption Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c50GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:25:10 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266910
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266910
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266910