I do not think that the noble Baroness need be frightened in any way of the word ““reasonable””. The difference in practical terms, if I could encapsulate it in a couple of sentences, is this: a presumption of ““contact”” means that a parent needs to explain why he wants reasonable contact and why it might be a good idea. A presumption of ““reasonable contact”” means that a parent needs to explain why and how there is a good enough reason to prevent reasonable contact. It is the onus of proof in a court. It has nothing to do with warring parents who cannot reach an agreement. This is what the court has to decide in determining a fair set of contact arrangements. That is how I would encapsulate it; and it is a crucial difference.
Children and Adoption Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Howe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Children and Adoption Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c14GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:46:46 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266863
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266863
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266863