UK Parliament / Open data

National Lottery Bill

Proceeding contribution from James Purnell (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bills on National Lottery Bill.
Clearly, that is a matter for the usual channels, but the Whips have been perfectly clear that the amount of time necessary for scrutiny will be granted. The delay until October is because of the link with the Olympics decision and to ensure proper scheduling of debates. We agree that the Bill must have proper scrutiny. On Macmillan nurses, the hon. Gentleman and his colleagues opposed New Opportunities Fund money going on health and yet I have three examples of Macmillan nurses benefiting from NOF, with money spent on nursing care, on the Borders general hospital in Melrose and on a hospice in Moray. I presume that he agrees with such activities and that he therefore supports the idea of lottery money going on health.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
435 c216 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top