UK Parliament / Open data

National Lottery Bill

Proceeding contribution from Richard Caborn (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 14 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bills on National Lottery Bill.
I am now looking at the explanatory notes, which I am sure the hon. Gentleman has read, and I believe that the negative procedure applies. If I am wrong, I will get back to him, but that is my understanding. I hope that I can now canter on a little further, if he will allow me, to clause 19. Clause 19 defines charitable expenditure, in relation to the Big Lottery Fund good causes, as expenditure that is ““charitable, benevolent or philanthropic””. It amounts to a purpose-based approach, rather than an institution-based approach. Good causes has been a matter of some concern, and I would like to give an absolute and clear assurance that, although we are making important changes, we are not seeking to change the scope of the good causes, nor opening up the fundamental principle of what lottery money can be spent on. When Parliament last considered the issue in 1998, health, education and the environment were added as things that are as important to people’s lives as sport, heritage and the arts. The Bill reaffirms the existing good causes, whose shares we have guaranteed until 2009. We have also said that the same good causes will continue beyond 2009, and this autumn we will consult about the overall priorities to be set under the existing powers for those existing good causes.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
435 c166 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top