UK Parliament / Open data

Embryology

Written question asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench) on Monday, 26 November 2007, in the House of Lords. It was answered by Lord Triesman (Labour) on Monday, 26 November 2007.

Question

asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answers by Lord Triesman on 12 November (WA 1–2), which empirical studies in either humans or other species have conclusively demonstrated the benefits of human somatic cell nuclear transfer with regard to therapies that overcome the problems of immune rejection with patient-specific embryonic stem cells as described in his earlier Answer.

Answer

Research on the benefits of human somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is ongoing and if proved successful in the laboratory could eventually be used for the treatment of humans. In such a circumstance, nuclei would be taken from the cells of the person to be treated to generate the stem cells that would then be developed into the type of cell to be used for treatment. In this case, because the material to be used would have been derived from the person being treated, it is unlikely that the recipient would reject the implanted tissue. There is a huge body of evidence to show that when foreign tissue is injected into a person, the person raises antibodies against it and will reject the implanted tissue.

Type
Written question
Reference
262; 696 c98-9WA
Session
2007-08
Embryology
Monday, 12 November 2007
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Wednesday, 12 December 2007
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Wednesday, 12 December 2007
Written questions
House of Lords
Embryology
Monday, 10 December 2007
Written questions
House of Lords
Back to top