Parliamentary search - Search results

Hunt of Kings Heath, Lord

Whether they would support a venture in London designed to raise funds for Childline, similar to the CowParade events in Chicago and New York. [HL 2841].

Asked by

Lord Dholakia (Liberal Democrat)

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Date

1 March 2002

Reference

HL 2841; 631 c262WA

House

House of Lords

Dept for Culture Media and Sport

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, if she will list the hammerhead crane at the former J. Samuel White's yard in Cowes.

Asked by

Andrew Turner (Conservative)

Answering body

Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Date

1 March 2002

Reference

38207; 380 c1629W

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many (a) farms, (b) dairy farms and (c) dairy cows there were in (i) the Ribble Valley and Fulwood constituency, (ii) Lancashire, (iii) the North West of England, (iv) Wales and (v) the United Kingdom in each...

Asked by

Nigel Evans (Conservative)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Date

27 February 2002

Reference

36425; 380 c1346-7W;380 c1348-9W

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how much her Department expects to contribute to farmers in North Yorkshire this year in CAP payments; and how many farms will receive payments. - Including table.

Asked by

Hugh Bayley (Labour)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Tabled on

5 February 2002

For answer on

26 February 2002

Answered on

26 February 2002

Hugh Bayley: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much her Department expects to contribute to farmers in North Yorkshire this year in CAP payments; and how many farms will receive payments. [34682] Mr. Morley: The latest available CAP scheme payments made to farmers in North Yorkshire, and the number of farms paid under each scheme are: _________________________________________________________________________________________________. CAP scheme and year{ 1} Amount paid (£) Number of farms paid Arable Area Payment Scheme (2001) {2}46,821,495 2,897 Beef Special Premium Scheme (2001) {3}4,584,681 2,791 Veal and Calf Slaughter Premium Scheme 53.25 3 (2000) Slaughter Premium Scheme (2000) 2,292,063 2,135 Suckler Cow Premium Scheme (2000) 4,439,554 1,304 Extensification Payment Scheme (2000) 3,343,953 1,495 Sheep Annual Premium Scheme (2000) 12,046,965 1,658 Hill Farm Allowance (2001) 6,607,832 1,894 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. {1} Figures from latest available scheme year {2} After modulation {3} Before modulation The total number of farms paid cannot be provided as the same farm may be covered by more than one of the CAP schemes.

Subjects

Farmers; Payment; North Yorkshire; Common agricultural policy

Date

26 February 2002

Reference

34682; 380 c1189-90W;380 c1192W

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, when she will reply to the letters from the honourable Member for West Derbyshire dated 18th March and 18th June, concerning Mr A. Tabbenor of Brooklands, Barnes Lane, Youlgrave, Derbyshire, and his suckler cow premium; when she will...

Asked by

Lord McLoughlin (Conservative)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Date

26 February 2002

Reference

380 c1194-5W;380 c1197W; 5881;21002

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the (a) payments made and (b) running costs have been of the (i) arable area payment scheme, (ii) suckler cow premium scheme, (iii) hill livestock compensatory allowance, (iv) hill farming allowance, (v) countryside stewardship scheme and (vi)...

Asked by

Colin Breed (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Tabled on

21 January 2002

For answer on

14 February 2002

Answered on

14 February 2002

Mr. Breed: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the (a) payments made and (b) running costs have been of the (i) arable area payment scheme, (ii) suckler cow premium scheme, (iii) hill livestock compensatory allowance, (iv) hill farming allowance, (v) countryside stewardship scheme and (vi) environmentally sensitive areas schemes since 1996. [29995] Mr. Morley: [holding answer 24 January 2002]: The amounts paid for (i) arable area payments scheme were: £ _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Scheme year Amount paid Administration costs 1996 1,054,740,241 6,824,000 1997 1,055,721,796 6,388,000 1998 985,942,025 6,730,000 1999 1,130,409,358 6,347,000 2000 882,979,696 {1}7,222,000 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. {1} Estimated outturn The amounts paid for (ii) suckler cow premium scheme were: £ _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Scheme year Amount paid Administration costs 1996 81,524,702 2,685,900 1997 78,762,180 2,373,600 1998 77,854,276 2,493,300 1999 70,567,139 3,752,071 2000 67,923,516 3,742,781 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. The amounts paid for (iii) hill livestock compensatory allowance were: £ _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Scheme year Amount paid Administration costs 1996 27,128,357 1,127,000 1997 41,398,518 996,000 1998 28,086,148 1,046,000 1999 44,288,837 1,755,281 2000 43,666,451 927,037 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. There were no amounts paid for (iv) hill farm allowance for these periods. The amounts paid for (v) countryside stewardship scheme were: £ _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Scheme year Amount paid Administration costs 1996 12,468,000 2,031,000 1997 17,126,000 1,793,000 1998 22,030,000 1,884,000 1999 26,038,000 1,773,000 2000 31,915,000 2,918,000 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. The amounts paid for (vi) environmentally sensitive areas scheme were: £ _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Scheme year Amount paid Administration costs 1996 27,591,000 1,461,000 1997 32,984,000 1,290,000 1998 36,376,000 1,355,000 1999 41,144,000 1,743,000 2000 43,807,000 2,005,000 _________________________________________________________________________________________________.

Subjects

Agriculture; Cost; Payment; Subsidy; Hill livestock allowance; Hill farming; Countryside stewardship scheme; Suckler cow premium; Arable farming; Arable area payments scheme; Environmentally sensitive areas

Date

14 February 2002

Reference

29995; 380 c640-1W;380 c642-3W

House

House of Commons

Deposited Paper DEP 02/393

[1] (a) Beef special premium scheme 2002: notes for guidance, (b) slaughter premium scheme 2002 adult animals over eight months: notes for guidance, (c) veal calf slaughter premium scheme 2002: notes for guidance. [2] The integrated administration and control system. IACS 1: 2001 edition. [3] (a) Suckler cow premium scheme...

Deposited by

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Deposited paper

Date

14 February 2002

Reference

DEP 02/393

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to her Answer of 29th January, 379 c240W, on genotype test errors, what plans she has to review the work carried out by LGC on the potential contamination of sheep brains with bovine material in October 2001....

Asked by

Colin Breed (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Date

12 February 2002

Reference

33775; 380 c263W

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if she will list the financial initiatives and resources sponsored by her Department in the last 12 months for Dorset which are additional to the Government SSA grants. - Inc tables and figures.

Asked by

Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Tabled on

21 January 2002

For answer on

11 February 2002

Answered on

11 February 2002

Jim Knight: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will list the financial initiatives and resources sponsored by her Department in the last 12 months for Dorset which are additional to the Government SSA grants. [29890] Mr. Morley: The major financial initiatives and resources sponsored in the last 12 months for Dorset are: (a) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) payments £000 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Scheme UK EU Arable Area Payment Scheme 427 200 Beef Special Premium Scheme 59 2,265 Countryside Stewardship Scheme 427 200 Extensification Payment Scheme 23 788 Environmentally Sensitive Areas 206 188 Slaughter Premium Scheme (EUTM) 0 122 Exception Payments (Miscellaneous) 23 0 Farm Woodland Premium Scheme 12 4 Farm Woodland Scheme 6 1 Organic Farming Scheme 325 303 Sheep Annual Premium Scheme 0 1,002 Suckler Cow Premium Scheme 2 1,095 Slaughter Premium Scheme 0 3 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. (b) Flood and Coastal Defences In the last 12 months the following schemes and studies have been approved for grant aid: _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Operating authority Scheme Purbeck borough council Evening Hill coast protection Swanage beach management study Durlston Bay strategy study Bournemouth borough council Poole and Christchurch Bay strategy study West Dorset district council Beaminster Ph3A flood alleviation Lyme Regis (Windsor Terrace) flood alleviation Preston Brook study Environment Agency Pymore flood alleviation Flood warning improvements _________________________________________________________________________________________________. The Department has paid grants of some £756,000 to the named schemes, as well as other on-going schemes. As part of the response to the autumn 2000 floods, the Department has further provided the Environment Agency with special contributions towards the costs of (i) emergency response and repairs and (ii) design and feasibility for accelerated river defences. The contributions made to the Avon/Dorset Flood Defence Committee in the last 12 months for these items have totalled £413,000 and £164,000 respectively.

Subjects

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Government department; Grant; Public expenditure; Dorset

Date

11 February 2002

Reference

29890; 380 c92W

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the total amount paid to farm businesses was in each of the last five years, indicating in each case the cost of administering the (a) arable area payment scheme, (b) suckler cow premium scheme, (c) hill livestock...

Asked by

Michael Jack (Conservative)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Tabled on

11 January 2002

For answer on

11 February 2002

Answered on

11 February 2002

Mr. Jack: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the total amount paid to farm businesses was in each of the last five years, indicating in each case the cost of administering the (a) arable area payment scheme, (b) suckler cow premium scheme, (c) hill livestock compensatory allowance, (d) hill farming allowance, (e) countryside stewardship scheme and (f) environmentally sensitive areas schemes. [27758] Mr. Morley: The amounts paid for (a) arable area payments scheme were: £ _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Scheme year Amount paid Administration costs 1996 1,054,740,241 6,824,000 1997 1,055,721,796 6,388,000 1998 685,942,025 6,730,000 1999 1,130,409,358 6,347,000 2000 882,979,696 {1}7,222,000 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. {1} Estimated outturn The amounts paid for (b) suckler cow premium scheme were: £ _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Scheme year Amount paid Administration costs 1996 81,524,702 2,685,900 1997 78,762,180 2,373,600 1998 77,854,276 2,493,300 1999 70,567,139 3,752,071 2000 67,923,516 3,742,781 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. The amounts paid for (c) hill livestock compensatory allowance were: £ _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Scheme year Amount paid Administration costs 1996 27,128,357 1,127,000 1997 42,398,518 996,000 1998 28,086,148 1,046,000 1999 44,288,837 1,755,281 2000 43,666,451 927,037 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. There were no amounts paid for (d) hill farm allowance for these periods. The amounts paid for (e) countryside stewardship scheme were: £ _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Scheme year Amount paid Administration costs 1996 12,468,000 2,031,000 1997 17,126,000 1,793,000 1998 22,030,000 1,884,000 1999 26,038,000 1,773,000 2000 31,915,000 2,918,000 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. The amounts paid for (f) environmentally sensitive areas scheme were: £ _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Scheme year Amount paid Administration costs 1996 27,591,000 1,461,000 1997 32,984,000 1,290,000 1998 36,376,000 1,355,000 1999 41,144,000 1,743,000 2000 43,807,000 2,005,000 _________________________________________________________________________________________________.

Subjects

Administration; Agriculture; Farm; Farmer; Payment; Subsidy; Hill livestock allowance; Countryside stewardship scheme; Suckler cow premium; Arable area payments scheme; Environmentally sensitive areas

Date

11 February 2002

Reference

380 c92-3W; 27758

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if she will list, by region, the value of outstanding payments for suckler cow premium. - Includes table. (Holding answer 1 February 2002).

Asked by

Peter Ainsworth (Conservative)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Tabled on

29 January 2002

For answer on

11 February 2002

Answered on

11 February 2002

Mr. Peter Ainsworth: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will list, by region, the value of outstanding payments for suckler cow premium. [32618] Margaret Beckett: [holding answer 1 February 2002]: The value of claims awaiting payment at 31 January 2002 is as follows: £ _________________________________________________________________________________________________. RPA office Value Cambridge 2,512,448.00 Carlisle 8,430,340.90 Crewe 3,231,748.40 Exeter 11,613,583.00 Newcastle 1,337,837.70 Northallerton 7,883,602.80 Nottingham 3,234,627.40 Reading 1,895,917.20 Total 40,140,105.40 _________________________________________________________________________________________________.

Subjects

Cattle; Administrative delay; Farmer; Subsidies; Suckler cow premiums

Date

11 February 2002

Reference

32618; 380 c80W

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the (a) farmgate and (b) market price was of (i) sheep, (ii) pigs, (iii) beef cattle, (iv) dairy cattle, (v) broiler chickens, (vi) free range chickens, (vii) sugar beet and (viii) cereals in each year since 1990...

Asked by

Colin Breed (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Tabled on

6 February 2002

For answer on

11 February 2002

Answered on

11 February 2002

Mr. Breed: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the (a) farmgate and (b) market price was of (i) sheep, (ii) pigs, (iii) beef cattle, (iv) dairy cattle, (v) broiler chickens, (vi) free range chickens, (vii) sugar beet and (viii) cereals in each year since 1990. [34868] Mr. Morley: The following tables show the farm gate output values, variable production costs, gross margins, fixed production costs and net margins for lowland sheep, pigs, beef cattle, dairy cattle, cereals and sugar beet for those years since 1990 for which data are available. These data are based on results from DEFRA commissioned surveys into the economics of farm enterprises. Data for broiler chickens and free range chickens are not available. Lowland sheep £ per ewe _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Lamb crop Output Variable costs Gross margin Fixed costs Net margin 1991 56 23 33 n/a n/a 1992 57 23 34 n/a n/a 1993 66 24 42 n/a n/a 1994 67 25 42 51 -9 1995 71 26 45 n/a n/a 1996 77 27 49 n/a n/a 1997 70 27 43 n/a n/a 1998 66 25 40 n/a n/a 1999 57 24 32 66 -33 2000 57 25 32 n/a n/a _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Pigs{ 1} £ per finished pig _________________________________________________________________________________________________. October to September Value of finished Feed costs Margin over feed Total costs Net margin pig 1991-92 73 42 31 64 9 1992-93 71 45 26 67 4 1993-94 62 42 20 n/a n/a 1994-95 72 42 31 n/a n/a 1995-96 91 47 44 n/a n/a 1996-97 77 43 34 70 7 1997-98 59 39 20 65 -6 1998-99 49 34 15 59 -10 1999-2000 58 36 22 n/a n/a 2000-01 68 40 28 n/a n/a _________________________________________________________________________________________________. {1} Data based on results from special surveys into the economics of pig production Lowland beef cattle finished at 16-22 months{ 1} £ per head _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Calendar year Output Variable costs Gross margin Fixed costs Net margin 1991 223 122 101 n/a n/a 1992 215 126 88 n/a n/a 1993 265 132 133 n/a n/a 1994 266 138 129 n/a n/a 1995 289 146 143 141 2 1996 256 163 93 158 -65 1997 198 145 53 n/a n/a 1998 209 136 72 n/a n/a 1999 249 134 113 n/a n/a 2000 248 137 111 n/a n/a _________________________________________________________________________________________________. {1} Data based on results from special surveys into the economics of lowland beef production Dairy cows £ per cow _________________________________________________________________________________________________. April to March Output Variable costs Gross margin Fixed costs Net margin 1991-92 1,149 413 737 n/a n/a 1992-93 1,240 427 813 n/a n/a 1993-94 1,297 468 829 n/a n/a 1994-95 1,318 497 821 n/a n/a 1995-96 1,453 555 897 n/a n/a 1996-97 1,480 547 933 574 359 1997-98 1,293 485 808 n/a n/a 1998-99 1,192 441 751 n/a n/a 1999-2000 1,117 448 669 n/a n/a 2000-01 1,137 455 682 n/a n/a _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Winter wheat £ per ha _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Harvest year Output Variable costs Gross margin Fixed costs Net margin 1991 861 258 603 n/a n/a 1992 892 253 640 n/a n/a 1993 952 265 688 365 322 1994 1,063 268 795 n/a n/a 1995 1,253 281 972 n/a n/a 1996 1,157 300 857 n/a n/a 1997 919 309 610 n/a n/a 1998 856 279 577 429 148 1999 872 255 617 n/a n/a 2000 835 256 579 n/a n/a _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Barley £ per ha _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Harvest year Output Variable costs Gross margin Fixed costs Net margin 1991 659 212 447 n/a n/a 1992 764 211 553 n/a n/a 1993 805 212 593 360 233 1994 895 213 682 n/a n/a 1995 1,076 224 852 n/a n/a 1996 1,028 247 780 n/a n/a 1997 804 249 555 n/a n/a 1998 735 226 509 418 91 1999 761 205 556 n/a n/a 2000 732 207 525 n/a n/a ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________. Sugar beet--harvest year 1995 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________. £ per ha Output 1,886 Variable costs 636 Gross margin 1,249 Fixed costs 564 Net margin 685 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________. Note: Figures may not add due to rounding

Subjects

Crops; Agriculture; Cost; Cattle; Cereal; Animal product; Poultry; Pig; Price; Sheep; Beef; Sugar beet; Agricultural product; Barley; Wheat

Date

11 February 2002

Reference

34868; 380 c86-8W

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how CAP funding is spent in the United Kingdom broken down by (a) types of schemes and (b) nations. (Further information on 14.02.2002 at 380 c660W). - Inc table.

Asked by

Simon Thomas (Plaid Cymru)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Tabled on

24 January 2002

For answer on

5 February 2002

Answered on

5 February 2002

Mr. Simon Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how CAP funding is spent in the United Kingdom broken down by (a) types of schemes and (b) nations. [31254] Mr. Morley: Latest estimates of CAP funding paid directly to farmers in 2001 are shown in the table, broken down by nations of the UK. CAP funding also includes indirect market support measures which cannot be split by nation and direct payments to farmers. Indirect market support cost £497 million in 2000-01. Subsidies paid directly to farmers in 2001 £ million _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Subsidies on product England Wales Scotland Northern Ireland UK Crop subsidies Arable area payments on: Wheat 330 2 16 1 349 Barley 180 5 68 7 259 Other cereal crops 22 1 5 {1}-- 27 Oilseed rape 94 {1}-- 9 {1}-- 103 Linseed 10 {1}-- {1}-- {1}-- 10 Peas and beans--stockfeed 67 {1}-- 1 {2}-- 68 and human consumption Other crops 7 1 {1}-- {1}-- 8 Other crop subsidies 3 {2}-- {1}-- {2}-- 3 Livestock subsidies: Beef special premium 126 24 46 46 242 Suckler cow premium 80 25 61 45 211 Slaughter premium 49 7 13 15 84 Extensification payment 50 15 34 27 126 scheme Over-30-month scheme 91 17 23 26 157 Beef national envelope 11 3 8 5 26 Sheep annual premium 74 53 42 13 182 FMD light lambs 1 2 2 {2}-- 5 Other subsidies: Dairy agrimonetary 56 8 6 9 79 compensation Total subsidies on products 1,249 162 334 194 1,943 Other subsidies Set-aside 162 1 20 1 184 Other animal disease 11 1 {1}-- 16 29 compensation Less favoured areas support 42 42 61 18 164 schemes Agri-environment schemes: 145 34 34 7 220 Countryside stewardship 49 {2}-- {2}-- {2}-- 49 Countryside premium {2}-- {2}-- 9 {2}-- 9 (Scotland) Tir Cymen and Tir Gofal {2}-- 13 {2}-- {2}-- 13 Organic farming 27 3 5 {1}-- 35 Environmentally sensitive 48 7 10 5 71 areas Nitrate sensitive areas 3 {2}-- {2}-- {2}-- 3 Woodland schemes 8 {1}-- 5 2 14 SSSI{3} 9 2 5 {2}-- 16 Other 2 8 {1}-- {1}-- 10 Total other subsidies 504 113 149 49 815 Total subsidies 1,754 276 482 243 2,760 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. {1} Negligible: less than 0.5 {2} Not applicable {3} Payments for sites of special scientific interest are not part of CAP

Subjects

Agriculture; Farmer; Subsidies; Common agricultural policy

Date

5 February 2002

Reference

31254; 379 c896-8W;379 c892-4W

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, when farmers will receive their suckler cow premiums; for what reason farmers have not received payment of the premiums; and if farmers will receive interest on late payments.

Asked by

Matthew Green (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Date

25 January 2002

Reference

29455; 378 c1164W

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, on what date her Department became aware that meat from the offspring of a cow with BSE had entered the human food chain; on what date her Department informed the Food Standards Agency that meat from the offspring...

Asked by

Peter Ainsworth (Conservative)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Date

23 January 2002

Reference

378 c921W; 28688;28687

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, by what means her Department became aware that meat from the offspring of a cow with BSE had entered the human food chain. - (Holding answer 18 January 2002).

Asked by

Peter Ainsworth (Conservative)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Date

23 January 2002

Reference

28686; 378 c922W

House

House of Commons

Dept for Culture Media and Sport

1st supplementary on decorating streets of London and Gravesend with life-sized fibreglass models of cows to boost tourism and raising money for charity.

Asked by

Chris Pond (Labour)

Answering body

Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Oral question - 1st Supplementary

Status

Answered

Date

21 January 2002

Reference

378 c603

House

House of Commons

Dept for Culture Media and Sport

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, What discussions she has had with the organisers of Cow Parade 2002.

Asked by

Chris Pond (Labour)

Answering body

Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Oral question - Lead

Status

Answered

Date

21 January 2002

Reference

26169; 378 c603

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the responsibility of LGC and Cellmark Diagnostics Ltd was in relation to errors in tests of sheep and cow brains; and if she will make a statement.

Asked by

Colin Breed (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Date

9 January 2002

Reference

24908; 377 c902W;377 c905-6W

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many heifers will be slaughtered at or near birth in 2001; and if she will make a statement. - (Holding answer 10 December 2001).

Asked by

Peter Ainsworth (Conservative)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written question

Status

Answered

Date

8 January 2002

Reference

377 c740W;377 c745W; 21853

House

House of Commons