I am grateful to the noble Lord for his kind words. I would just refer him to the proposed new clause to be inserted by the amendment in the name of his noble friend Lord Young, which is headed “Independent body to advise on pay and terms and conditions of employment for employees of public sector companies”. I make it that, during this debate, the party opposite has proposed no fewer than seven different bodies, groups, organisations or committees—call them what you like. As the Opposition rails regularly against too much bureaucracy, I am astonished that they want to create yet another body. In the event of a pay dispute, does the noble Lord not agree that that is why, many years ago, we created the conciliation and arbitration service? Such matters are better referred to it—we are surely running out of lawyers to sit on all these bodies—rather than creating yet another bureaucratic organisation.
Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Snape
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 21 October 2024.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
840 c503 
Session
2024-25
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-10-22 16:19:29 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2024-10-21/24102138000015
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2024-10-21/24102138000015
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2024-10-21/24102138000015