My Lords, the treaty guarantees that anyone relocated to Rwanda will be given safety and support and will not be returned to a country where their life or freedom will be threatened. That directly addresses the Supreme Court’s concerns about refoulement. As to the matter of the use I made of the word “academic”, I was using that in answer to points raised by noble Lords in relation to why the Bill bars the taking of general points of academic interest, which was referring to a point once the Bill and the treaty are in place. Once they are in place, there is no possibility of refoulement from Rwanda without contravention of an international instrument. The point is that, at that stage, argument before the domestic courts would be academic. I give way to the noble Lord.
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Stewart of Dirleton
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 February 2024.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
836 c415 
Session
2023-24
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-03-18 14:25:39 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2024-02-19/24021964000016
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2024-02-19/24021964000016
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2024-02-19/24021964000016