My Lords, I do not have an objection in principle to this amendment. Indeed, it sets out a requirement for information which I would suspect in about six months’ time several normal legal websites will carry on a search inserting words such as “What is still in force of EU legislation?” But I am troubled by the implication that this is a substitute for the two amendments that this House passed two days ago and for Amendment 76. I think it would be misleading for any Division or determination on this amendment to be based on that premise.
Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Carlile of Berriew
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 May 2023.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
830 c262
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-05-19 11:28:42 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-05-17/23051766000013
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-05-17/23051766000013
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-05-17/23051766000013