UK Parliament / Open data

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

My Lords, I have one clarification for the noble Baroness. The point was made that this is not a Second Reading, but it has also been recognised that the amendments to the original Bill are substantial. The difficulty I have is how we hold this Bill to account when it is different from the Bill that we were holding to account. In many ways, it has been gutted, and we have had four days to assess it. I am not suggesting lots of Second Reading

speeches; I simply wanted to reflect, as the noble Baroness already has, that this is a big change to the Bill. How do we deal with that in this discussion?

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
830 c22 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top