I think I am right on this, although the noble Baroness might correct me. I got through the first 38 clauses and I think this was the first time I saw this particular revocation and amendment power being given to the Secretary of State. I believe that would have the effect of that amendment being made without any further reference to Parliament, other than through a set of regulations that we cannot amend—so its absence would simply mean that, should something need to be corrected, it would come back to Parliament. Is that interpretation correct?
Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Stunell
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 15 March 2023.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
828 c1330 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-10-05 21:14:03 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-03-15/23031569000047
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-03-15/23031569000047
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-03-15/23031569000047