Before the noble Lord sits down, could I raise one point on delay? I am trying to visualise a situation in which officials are considering a particular set of regulations—let us not identify them—that are complicated. Therefore, the possibility of delaying a decision on those regulations is under way. We get to 30 December 2023: no statutory instrument has been laid, because they are still considering whether to delay consideration. How is this to be considered “scrutinised by the House”? There will be nothing there to scrutinise—there will be no statutory instrument—and the House will be thinking that this set of regulations will disappear on 31 December.
Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hendy
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2023.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
828 c214 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Legislation
Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill 2022-23Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts by Children in Front Seats) Regulations 1993
Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017
Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018
Road Vehicles (Approval) Regulations 2020
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-03-13 17:25:23 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-02-28/23022873000040
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-02-28/23022873000040
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-02-28/23022873000040