I do admire my noble friend’s defence of the impeccable parliamentary democracy which lies behind the Bill, but I think the author of it was Jacob Rees-Mogg, and I think his principal aims were to make sure that all law was British law and none of it was foreign law, for ideological reasons. I think he thought of it as deregulatory, producing lower and, in his opinion, less costly standards, which is why a rule was put into the Bill that it could not actually raise any of our standards. My noble friend’s present passion in defending it does not actually reflect the motives behind the Bill, and yesterday’s triumph was an abandonment of an otherwise similarly absurd approach, epitomised by the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill.
Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Clarke of Nottingham
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2023.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
828 c203 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Legislation
Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill 2022-23Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts by Children in Front Seats) Regulations 1993
Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017
Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018
Road Vehicles (Approval) Regulations 2020
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-03-13 17:25:16 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-02-28/23022872000033
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-02-28/23022872000033
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-02-28/23022872000033