I understand the noble Baroness’s impatience, and she has been very generous and helpful. Did I hear her just a few moments ago, in response to an intervention, say that in each and every case, once a ministerial decision has been taken, the statutory instrument being repealed or amended will come to this House—which I assume means it gets the approval of this House and the House of Commons? How does the Bill provide for that in each and every decision, because it seems at the moment to give an enormous amount of ministerial discretion in its text? How can she guarantee that Parliament will have the last say over repeals and amendments in every case?
Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Clarke of Nottingham
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2023.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
828 c172 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Legislation
Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill 2022-23Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts by Children in Front Seats) Regulations 1993
Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017
Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018
Road Vehicles (Approval) Regulations 2020
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-03-13 17:24:56 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-02-28/23022865000030
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-02-28/23022865000030
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-02-28/23022865000030