Before the noble Baroness turns to the specifics, would she deal with the general point that has been made? Does she regret that a letter which can be described only as obfuscatory, tautological gobbledegook was delivered to Members of this House about an hour after this debate started? How can we honourably be expected to digest that letter in particular if this House is treated in that way?
Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Carlile of Berriew
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2023.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
828 c169
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Legislation
Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill 2022-23Motor Vehicles (Wearing of Seat Belts by Children in Front Seats) Regulations 1993
Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017
Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018
Road Vehicles (Approval) Regulations 2020
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-03-13 17:24:47 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-02-28/23022865000011
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-02-28/23022865000011
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-02-28/23022865000011