My Lords, I support my noble friend Lady Thornton and I support the spirit behind both Amendments 67 and 68, for the following reason. Over the years—you could argue, over the centuries—the balance of power between the Executive and legislature has changed, and it has changed to the detriment of the legislature. Therefore, whenever I see an amendment of the kind proposed in Amendments 67 and 68, which requires that a particular appointment—in this case it is the free speech director but it could be any other important post that arises in legislation—should be subject to the approval of the relevant Select Committee of the House of Commons, I think that is a very good thing. It would be a modest step towards rebalancing the imbalance that I fear is infecting the relations between both Houses of this Parliament, and between us and the Executive. I support the amendments for that reason.
Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Viscount Stansgate
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 November 2022.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
825 c750 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-11-25 12:30:57 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-11-14/22111448000039
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-11-14/22111448000039
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-11-14/22111448000039