Does the Minister think it appropriate that there should be left in place two possible routes for a complainant—a regulatory route and a Clause 4 route—without there being any guidance whatever in the legislation as to who should or should not go first? At the moment, the Minister is saying, by way of assertion without a scrap of evidence to support it, if I may respectfully say so, that the expectation is that people will use the regulatory procedure first if they are going to make a complaint. At the moment, the legislation does not cater for that problem. Is he satisfied with that?
Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Grabiner
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 November 2022.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
825 c727 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-11-25 12:44:54 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-11-14/22111446000004
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-11-14/22111446000004
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-11-14/22111446000004