On modern slavery, the Minister is surely saying that there has to have been a conviction for somebody to be on the debarred list. The first person prosecuted under the Modern Slavery Act—I almost hesitate to say this—was Sainsbury, so they had a case against them. Sorry, I am just trying to understand this; is the Minister saying that they would therefore be on the debarment list? I do not think that is the intention.
Procurement Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Neville-Rolfe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 18 July 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Procurement Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
823 c624GC
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-10-04 16:17:43 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-18/2207193000004
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-18/2207193000004
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-07-18/2207193000004