UK Parliament / Open data

Procurement Bill [HL]

I think the problem may be in the language of paragraph (b), because it does not fulfil what the Minister has been saying is the intention of “covered”. You could keep “covered” but reword paragraph (b) so that it explains more fully what “covered” means, which is what I think the Minister is attempting to do. As it stands, it is very confusing. A confusing definition is a bad way to start a Bill.

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
823 c197GC 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top