UK Parliament / Open data

Channel 4 Privatisation

Private notice question on Tuesday, 5 April 2022, in the House of Lords, led by Lord McNally. The answering member was Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay.
Lords private notice question on what plans they have regarding the privatisation of Channel 4.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
820 cc1970-5 
Session
2021-22
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Proceeding contributions
Lord McNally | 820 c1970 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, on behalf of my noble friend Lady Bonham-Carter, I beg leave to ask the Question of whi...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1970 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, following a consultation, the Culture Secretary has come to a decision that, although C...


Show all contributions (32)
Lord McNally | 820 c1971 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, will the Government publish immediately the consultation, which was completed over six ...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1971 (Link to this contribution)

On the noble Lord’s first point, the responses to the consultation will be published alongside th...

Lord Bassam of Brighton | 820 c1971 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, last Friday the energy price cap increased by £700; inflation continues to climb and ma...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1971 (Link to this contribution)

I must say that I find that a weak argument from the noble Lord. The Government are capable of do...

Lord Deben | 820 c1972 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps my noble friend could help me. If a former constituent came up to me in the street and sa...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1972 (Link to this contribution)

I am not sure that all my noble friend’s constituents might phrase it like that. As I said to the...

Lord Newby | 820 c1972 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in his initial Answer the Minister said that the current structure of Channel 4 was hol...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1972 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the Government recognise the huge success that Channel 4 has been over the last 40 year...

Lord Stevenson of Balmacara | 820 c1972 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the Minister mentioned a long-awaited and much-needed White Paper. This is a very compl...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1973 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord is absolutely right; there are many issues of detail which of course we cannot cov...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 820 c1973 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, does my noble friend not think it extraordinary that people who constantly complain abo...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1973 (Link to this contribution)

I heartily agree with my noble friend. Of course, the production companies in the independent sec...

Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall | 820 c1973 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the Minister has made much of the competitive challenges facing Channel 4 and has refer...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1973 (Link to this contribution)

Of course they can coexist. What we want to make sure of is that Channel 4 is existing, competing...

Lord Watts | 820 c1973 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, is it not the case that the Government do not like criticism? They have cowed the BBC o...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1974 (Link to this contribution)

At the moment, Channel 4 is uniquely constrained; it can neither borrow nor benefit from private ...

Lord Sherbourne of Didsbury | 820 c1974 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, does the Minister realise that it was the Labour Party in the 1950s which bitterly oppo...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1974 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to my noble friend for that reminder; he is absolutely right. It is important that ...

Lord Dubs | 820 c1974 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, if the Government insist on pursuing this policy, what safeguard will there be against ...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1974 (Link to this contribution)

Like the sale of any Government asset, the sale of Channel 4 will need to meet a careful assessme...

Lord Campbell of Pittenweem | 820 c1974 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, but is not Netflix a complete red herring? How many journalists and camera crews has Ne...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1974 (Link to this contribution)

Netflix is not a news producer in the way that Channel 4 is a public service broadcaster, but it ...

Baroness Altmann | 820 c1974 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I understand the need for Channel 4 to have extra resources, but could my noble friend ...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1975 (Link to this contribution)

Absolutely. The independent production sector has exploded since Channel 4 was created 40 years a...

Lord Hannan of Kingsclere | 820 c1975 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, ever since the announcement was made, we have been hearing about all these rare cultura...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1975 (Link to this contribution)

I will not join my noble friend in singling out particular programmes —de gustibus non est disput...

Lord Addington | 820 c1975 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, following on from the last question, would the Minister give us his thoughts on which o...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1975 (Link to this contribution)

Channel 4 did a fantastic job in broadcasting the Paralympics, and indeed in bringing the entire ...

Lord Grocott | 820 c1975 (Link to this contribution)

I have been trying to follow the Minister’s logic over the last 14 minutes. Basically, he is sayi...

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay | 820 c1975 (Link to this contribution)

It is a wonderful company doing a fantastic job, but the last 40 years look very different from t...

Notes
Question asked on behalf of Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury.
Back to top