UK Parliament / Open data

Judicial Pensions Regulations 2022

Debates on delegated legislation on Monday, 4 April 2022, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar. The answering member was Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede.
Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
820 cc504-1263GC 
Session
2021-22
Department
Ministry of Justice
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Judicial Pensions Regulations
Thursday, 17 March 2022
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee thirty-fifth report.
Tuesday, 29 March 2022
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Judicial Pensions Regulations 2022
Wednesday, 6 April 2022
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 820 cc284-5GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this statutory instrument establishes the judicial pension scheme 2022 and forms part o...

Lord Davies of Brixton | 820 cc286-7GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I welcome the regulations: I am in favour of good pension schemes for our public servan...


Show all contributions (8)
Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall | 820 c505GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I do not know whether the noble Lord has come to the end of his remarks; it appears tha...

Baroness Kramer | 820 cc505-289GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, on one level, I do not object to this legislation. In 2015, I think, the Finance Act ma...

Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede | 820 cc289-937GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing this statutory instrument. The parent Act to it, i...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 820 cc290-2GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to all those who have contributed this afternoon. I will try to respond t...

Baroness Kramer | 820 c292GC (Link to this contribution)

Unfortunately, I handed my notes to Hansard, but I think that if the Minister looks at the divers...

Lord Wolfson of Tredegar | 820 cc292-4GC (Link to this contribution)

I am very happy to accept that. I was not putting forward the point I just made as the only reaso...

Back to top