I would like to raise a small, technical point; I think that the Minister skimmed over it in the debate on Amendment 33 in my name, possibly because I did not explain it properly. Subsidies for fossil fuels should be calculated using the IMF definition of financial assistance for fuel consumption multiplied by the difference between existing and efficient prices. In his reply, the Minister explained that he would not want to ban subsidies for fossils fuels, but he did not say anything about the merits of the IMF definition of fossil fuel subsidies. This is an important issue because it factors in the negative impacts of environmental and social costs, which are otherwise ignored. When we look at fossil fuel subsidies holistically, we realise just how much more expensive fossil fuels are than renewables. I do not expect an answer today, but it would be good to have an answer in writing whenever possible because the Minister did not mention it.
Subsidy Control Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb
(Green Party)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 February 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Subsidy Control Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
818 c233GC 
Session
2021-22
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-05 14:49:10 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-02-02/22020279000088
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-02-02/22020279000088
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-02-02/22020279000088