My Lords, after listening to the debate, it is clear that we are united in seeking to protect our troops from vexatious claims and shoddy investigations. Both amendments in the group seek to do this and would approach the issue head on, unlike the presumption. However, I am convinced from my previous research and from listening to the debate that Amendment 6, which has direct effect, has the appropriate priority. It seems that, while one hears little accusation of unfairness by prosecutors, as a number of noble Lords have pointed out, there is a requirement for prosecutors to ensure that prosecutions are fair. There has been much concern about the investigations, so I favour the clarity of Amendment 6. We will not divide the House on Amendment 1 and will support the noble Lord, Lord Thomas, whom we urge to test the opinion of the House on Amendment 6. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Tunnicliffe
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 April 2021.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
811 c1180 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-12-27 15:04:12 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-04-13/21041344000068
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-04-13/21041344000068
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-04-13/21041344000068