My Lords, I support the noble Baroness, Lady Bowles, in probing the effect of these two government amendments. As a well-known supporter of a well-functioning IP profession, right across the United Kingdom, I have to say that I am still confused. It seems to me that, in the UK single market, the rights of these various attorneys should be fully reciprocal. Can my noble friend confirm that that is the intention? Will he further kindly reflect on whether it is the effect and, if they are not reciprocal, whether that is justified? Indeed, is there any read-across to the problems that we have encountered on the lack of reciprocal rights for EU and UK attorneys? We have discussed this elsewhere. I know that the department has had a rethink, but are we quite there?
United Kingdom Internal Market Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Neville-Rolfe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 2 November 2020.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on United Kingdom Internal Market Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
807 c502 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-29 12:18:36 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-11-02/20110236000015
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-11-02/20110236000015
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-11-02/20110236000015