In principle, I have some sympathy with the amendments. My concern goes to the heart of the ministerial discretion in appointing and reappointing members of the Trade Remedies Authority. I am attracted to a period of two terms of five years and I would be interested to know the thinking of the noble Lord, Lord Purvis, in reducing it to three years. A maximum of two terms of five years would seem more appropriate. In probing my noble friend’s thinking in this regard, I am obviously wedded to the idea of parliamentary scrutiny and would be interested to know whether he does not share my concern that there might be too much ministerial discretion in appointing and reappointing members, which goes to the heart of the independence of their terms of tenure. I will wind up by saying that I think that five years is more appropriate—unless I could understand better why three years and a maximum of six years was put forward on this occasion.
Trade Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 8 October 2020.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Trade Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
806 c229GC 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-28 16:54:24 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-10-08/20100847000131
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-10-08/20100847000131
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-10-08/20100847000131