My Lords, I like this amendment very much. The noble Lord, Lord Krebs, has managed to write out and explain clearly exactly what a bycatch objective should be whereas, in the Bill, there is not so much that and more a breakdown of how it will be achieved. Having said that, I congratulate the Government on their determination to stop discarding and to prevent bycatch or at least ensure that, if caught, it has to be landed and accounted for. That is the positive side, but the definition in the amendment proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Krebs, is a much better one. To make sure that the bycatch objective is actually fulfilled, I hope that the Government will support the amendment on remote electronic monitoring, which the House will probably deal with on Wednesday.
Fisheries Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Teverson
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 June 2020.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Fisheries Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
804 c58 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-06-30 15:28:25 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-06-22/20062234000125
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-06-22/20062234000125
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-06-22/20062234000125