I am sorry to interrupt the Minister, and I thank him for sitting down. The notion of an amendment proposing REM is not specifying a particular technology. As I mentioned in my introduction to Amendment 124, there are rapidly emerging technologies; I gave the example of Shellcatch, which works on your smartphone. I did not see this as prescribing a particular method, but rather saying that what we need is a system to get accurate data on what is being caught—whether it is from the point of view of the discard ban or of getting accurate harvest data to inform fisheries scientists’ modelling—without prescribing particular technologies. I just want to make it clear that I did not have a particular gadget in mind, I had the notion of using whatever was the latest technology—which will, as the Minister has said, evolve over time.
Fisheries Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Krebs
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 March 2020.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Fisheries Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
802 c845 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-27 15:24:12 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-03-09/20030935000015
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-03-09/20030935000015
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-03-09/20030935000015