UK Parliament / Open data

Customs Safety and Security Procedures (EU Exit) Regulations 2019

Debates on delegated legislation on Tuesday, 26 March 2019, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Bates. The answering member was Lord Tunnicliffe.
Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
796 cc1792-1802 
Session
2017-19
Department
Treasury
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Cash Controls (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations
Wednesday, 27 February 2019
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Customs (Economic Operators Registration and Identification) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations
Wednesday, 27 February 2019
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Customs Safety and Security Procedures (EU Exit) Regulations
Wednesday, 27 February 2019
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (Sub-Committee A) twentieth report
Monday, 11 March 2019
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords

Show all related items (6)
Customs (Economic Operators Registration and Identification) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
Tuesday, 26 March 2019
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Cash Controls (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
Tuesday, 26 March 2019
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Bates | 796 cc1792-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in moving these regulations, I will speak to the three statutory instruments that are p...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 796 c1794 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, before the Minister sits down, can he tell the House how many businesses currently have...


Show all contributions (25)
Lord Bates | 796 c1794 (Link to this contribution)

The current position is that the largest number of businesses affected would be UK businesses. Th...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 796 c1795 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the Minister for indicating how many businesses would be required to have one. H...

Lord Bates | 796 c1795 (Link to this contribution)

The answer is 52,000. I beg to move.

Lord Palmer of Childs Hill | 796 cc1795-6 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the Minister for the explanation of these three statutory instruments and for the detail ...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 796 cc1796-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, when the Trade Bill first came to this Chamber in September, out of interest I register...

Lord Tunnicliffe | 796 cc1797-8 (Link to this contribution)

I too thank the Minister for presenting these SIs. Taking them in the same order as on the Order ...

Lord Bates | 796 cc1798-9 (Link to this contribution)

I am afraid that I will probably disappoint the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe. In this context, I ...

Lord Tunnicliffe | 796 c1799 (Link to this contribution)

Will the Minister flesh out the word “important”? Can businesses trade if they do not have—I cann...

Lord Bates | 796 c1799 (Link to this contribution)

That is the whole point. We are saying that, in the event of no deal, they would require that to ...

Lord Palmer of Childs Hill | 796 c1799 (Link to this contribution)

If there are a lot of businesses which have not registered, through negligence or misinformation,...

Lord Bates | 796 c1799 (Link to this contribution)

Clearly, that is a risk. We have put out technical notices and engaged quite significantly with i...

Lord Tunnicliffe | 796 c1799 (Link to this contribution)

I hope the Minister will forgive me for pressing this point, but there is a world of difference b...

Lord Bates | 796 c1799 (Link to this contribution)

Once they became aware of that situation, if that eventuality occurred, the remedy—to get the reg...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 796 c1799 (Link to this contribution)

Businesses cannot do it afterwards if they want to trade on day one of exit if there is no deal. ...

Lord Bates | 796 c1800 (Link to this contribution)

Let me clarify that, because I think we can be more helpful on that point. There is a lighter-tou...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 796 c1800 (Link to this contribution)

I am not sure that it offered the clarity we need. Is it the Government’s position that, in the a...

Lord Bates | 796 c1800 (Link to this contribution)

The reality is that we would prefer them to have an EORI registration number. It is a fairly stra...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 796 cc1800-1 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful for the Minister’s patience on this. It is important. He said at the Dispatch Box t...

Lord Bates | 796 c1801 (Link to this contribution)

I am advised that the customs declarations service does have the capacity to process significantl...

Lord Palmer of Childs Hill | 796 c1801 (Link to this contribution)

Just to clarify once more, there has been legal advice over the years that, when something is in ...

Lord Bates | 796 c1801 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord may not have been present for a rather fascinating debate on Pepper v Hart, which ...

Lord Purvis of Tweed | 796 c1801 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful again to the Minister because this is a very important point. My question is a simp...

Lord Bates | 796 c1802 (Link to this contribution)

I am afraid that I cannot go further than what I have in front of me, but I will happily put an a...

Back to top