My Lords, I have just one quick question to follow on from the comments of my colleague, who is so much better versed in this than me. It struck me that we seem to have one timetable proposed by the FCA and a different one proposed by the PRA, without an awful lot of logic as to why one takes one approach and the other takes another. Are these two regulators working completely independently and sending over their various paragraphs that then get incorporated into the statutory instrument, or is there some coherent framework? If the regulators are not working together, what can we do to make sure that they will, because it will be complicated enough for business without trying to work out which regulator is thinking which way. I would assume—I do not know—that some entities find that they face both regulators. Why the difference under the new rules that each regulator is bringing forward?
Financial Services Contracts (Transitional and Saving Provision) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Kramer
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 February 2019.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Financial Services Contracts (Transitional and Saving Provision) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
795 c1733 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2019-03-01 13:35:53 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-02-11/19021156000192
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-02-11/19021156000192
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-02-11/19021156000192