UK Parliament / Open data

Over the Counter Derivatives, Central Counterparties and Trade Repositories (Amendment, etc., and Transitional Provision) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018

Debates on delegated legislation on Monday, 4 February 2019, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Young of Cookham. The answering member was Lord Tunnicliffe.
Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
795 cc355-364GC 
Session
2017-19
Department
Treasury
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Over the Counter Derivatives, Central Counterparties and Trade Repositories (Amendment, etc., and Transitional Provision) (EU Exit) Regulations
Wednesday, 5 December 2018
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Financial Markets and Insolvency (Amendment and Transitional Provision) (EU Exit) Regulations
Thursday, 13 December 2018
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Financial Markets and Insolvency (Amendment and Transitional Provision) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
Monday, 4 February 2019
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Deposited Paper DEP2019-0220
Thursday, 14 February 2019
Deposited papers
House of Lords

Show all related items (5)
Collective Investment Schemes (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
Monday, 18 February 2019
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Young of Cookham | 795 cc355-8GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, as this instrument has been grouped, I will speak also to the Financial Markets and Ins...

Lord Sharkey | 795 cc358-9GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, as the Minister noted, the first SI—dealing with OTC derivatives, CCPs and trade reposi...


Show all contributions (14)
Lord Tunnicliffe | 795 cc359-360GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, there is much that I would support in the intervention by the noble Lord, Lord Sharkey....

Baroness Kramer | 795 c360GC (Link to this contribution)

Thus is quite an important question. At the moment, LCH is the dominant clearing house globally a...

Lord Tunnicliffe | 795 cc360-1GC (Link to this contribution)

No, that is very good. It might turn my casual question into quite a substantial one.

I not...

Lord Young of Cookham | 795 c361GC (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have taken part. I detected no objection to the ba...

Lord Tunnicliffe | 795 c362GC (Link to this contribution)

We hear that explanation and I have great sympathy for the civil servants involved with this task...

Lord Young of Cookham | 795 c362GC (Link to this contribution)

I plead guilty as charged. As I said a moment ago, we recognise the importance of parliamentary s...

Lord Sharkey | 795 c362GC (Link to this contribution)

I asked about the absence of the impact assessments from the Printed Paper Office. That is the ro...

Lord Young of Cookham | 795 c362GC (Link to this contribution)

Again, I take that seriously. Would the noble Lord allow me to make some inquiries within the mac...

Baroness Kramer | 795 c362GC (Link to this contribution)

Having gone to the Printed Paper Office myself well into the afternoon, I know that if the Printe...

Lord Young of Cookham | 795 cc362-3GC (Link to this contribution)

We need a post-mortem on this, which I will authorise.

In response to the question put by t...

Lord Tunnicliffe | 795 c363GC (Link to this contribution)

The appropriate paragraph does say that you are substituting one set of criminal offences with an...

Lord Young of Cookham | 795 cc363-4GC (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord asked a good question: is the creation of a criminal offence consistent with the w...

Back to top