The Minister said just now that the reason why he could not be confident of the extent of the consultation was the shortness of time. As I understand it from the Explanatory Notes, the major issues that were going to be addressed in this particular statutory instrument were laid out in the technical notice produced by the IPO back in September of last year, so there have been four months where presumably the main issues have been subject to consultation. That is not really a shortness of time; there was quite a lot of time in those four months for the consultation to take place. When he is addressing this issue in his letter, I wonder if he will be able to address why he thinks that the shortness of time in this case has caused so much difficulty in making the consultation as full and comprehensive as it should be.
Trade Marks (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Tyler
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 January 2019.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Trade Marks (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
795 c65GC 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2019-01-24 16:07:43 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-01-14/19011475000271
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-01-14/19011475000271
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-01-14/19011475000271