I take the noble Lord’s point, which is pertinent. However, do not forget that if we keep to this three-stranded model, we have a Secretary of State and, where appropriate, an Irish Foreign Minister, and in the proper format there is no reason why they cannot be engaged. I am saying that maybe it would be an incentive if the Secretary of State made it clear that a process was starting and that the parties understood that if they were not prepared to participate in that, perhaps she and others would start to take decisions. I am not trying to be obstructive or rule anything out. I am simply saying, be careful. It sounds like a good idea, but bear in mind that people who are serial negotiators—they have been doing this for 25 or 30 years —will put things on the table and open the whole thing up. My only worry about this is that it just postpones the decisions even further, although I understand fully the noble Lord’s good intentions.
Northern Ireland (Executive Formation and Exercise of Functions) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Empey
(Ulster Unionist Party)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 30 October 2018.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Northern Ireland (Executive Formation and Exercise of Functions) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
793 c1303 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-10-31 13:55:55 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-10-30/18103059000047
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-10-30/18103059000047
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-10-30/18103059000047