My Lords, the scope for regulation under the provisions that are in issue is very wide. It is an area in which there is, as the noble and learned Lord, Lord Judge, said, a great deal of legislation already. I therefore hope that my noble friend the Minister will be able to indicate some form of restriction that might be acceptable in relation to this particular power. In the debate that we had on Monday, he pointed out that the power would be used only in restoring, in effect, what might be lost as a result of our leaving the European Union and that, in particular, there is power under the European Communities Act 1972 to do a good deal under statutory provision that is not by primary legislation. I thought that, if that were the case, it would be a justification for using this particular method. In this case, however, there does not appear to be justification for anything like that. I therefore invite my noble friend to indicate, as far as he can, what restriction he has in mind and whether that restriction could be embodied in the terms of the legislation.
Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Mackay of Clashfern
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 January 2018.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
788 c672 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-28 13:53:17 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-01-17/18011727000195
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-01-17/18011727000195
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2018-01-17/18011727000195