As I understood it—and the noble Baroness, Lady Ludford, referred to this—one of the weaknesses of the EAW was that it was being used for fishing expeditions, which tended to undermine it, and that the EIO was to fill that gap; in other words, you could ask questions which did not require an EAW, which had been brought into disrepute in some senses. But that is not the case, is it? You have to be a prisoner before you can have an EIO, so we are back to fishing expeditions again. There is no way that an EIO could be served on the ordinary person in the street because they are not a prisoner. Our concern about fishing expedition continues, I think.
Criminal Justice (European Investigation Order) Regulations 2017
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 December 2017.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Criminal Justice (European Investigation Order) Regulations 2017.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
787 c100GC 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-12-21 12:44:53 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-12-06/17120649000155
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-12-06/17120649000155
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-12-06/17120649000155