Ofcom reports every year, so I do not think it would matter whether it is 12 months or 24. My point was specifically on mobile coverage for which the 12 months would not be appropriate, because 5G has not really been invented yet, so there certainly will not be any visible signs on mobile coverage. Essentially, we are saying that we want fibre-optic cable to be laid over all areas of the country to improve future mobile reception and also fibre to the premises, which is what the future gold standard is. We need it everywhere, not just in rural areas. While we accept that rural and hard-to-reach areas have a problem, I have laid down a series of other measures to deal with those areas specifically.
Telecommunications Infrastructure (Relief from Non-Domestic Rates) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Ashton of Hyde
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 24 October 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Telecommunications Infrastructure (Relief from Non-Domestic Rates) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
785 c30GC 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-12 16:34:15 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-10-24/17102433000053
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-10-24/17102433000053
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-10-24/17102433000053