My Lords, I will speak very briefly to Motion F. The original Bill produced an appeal system that was far too narrow, and the amendment that I and my noble friend Lord Lisvane proposed suggested that it should be wider. We used words which were reflective of advocacy rather than law, and argued that the ground of appeal should be on the basis that the decision was wrong. That view appealed to this House. We have reconsidered it and discussed it with the Secretary of State and the Minister. The amendment now proposed by the Government makes much better law and, given that, I support it.
Higher Education and Research Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Judge
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 27 April 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Higher Education and Research Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
782 c1462 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-06-05 14:56:21 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-04-27/17042725000191
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-04-27/17042725000191
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-04-27/17042725000191