UK Parliament / Open data

Important Public Services (Border Security) Regulations 2017

Debates on delegated legislation on Tuesday, 24 January 2017, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Prior of Brampton. The answering member was Lord Mendelsohn.
Lords motions to approve. Agreed to on question.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
778 cc637-655 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Trade Union Act 2016 (Political Funds) (Transition Period) Regulations
Monday, 5 December 2016
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Important Public Services (Fire) Regulations
Monday, 5 December 2016
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Important Public Services (Education) Regulations
Monday, 5 December 2016
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Important Public Services (Health) Regulations
Monday, 5 December 2016
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons

Show all related items (12)
Important Public Services (Transport) Regulations
Monday, 5 December 2016
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Important Public Services (Border Security) Regulations
Monday, 5 December 2016
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee twentieth report.
Tuesday, 20 December 2016
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Important Public Services (Education) Regulations 2017
Tuesday, 24 January 2017
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Important Public Services (Fire) Regulations 2017
Tuesday, 24 January 2017
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Important Public Services (Health) Regulations 2017
Tuesday, 24 January 2017
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Important Public Services (Transport) Regulations 2017
Tuesday, 24 January 2017
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Trade Union Act 2016 (Political Funds) (Transition Period) Regulations 2017
Tuesday, 24 January 2017
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Prior of Brampton | 778 cc638-642 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the Trade Union Act modernises the UK’s industrial relations framework to better suppor...

Lord Foster of Bath | 778 cc640-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, neither the Minister nor I served on the committee that discussed the Trade Union Bill....


Show all contributions (12)
Lord Kerslake | 778 c645 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I intend to keep my remarks short, not least because the noble Lord, Lord Foster, made ...

Lord Monks | 778 cc645-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the real purpose of the Act was revealed to me by a former Conservative employment Mini...

Lord Whitty | 778 cc646-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in focusing on the last of these regulations I do not mean to say that I agree with any...

Lord Stoneham of Droxford | 778 cc648-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am pleased to join in this debate. I was involved in the original proceedings on the ...

Lord Mendelsohn | 778 cc649-654 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I associate myself with the contributions that have been made. They have been pretty ou...

Lord Prior of Brampton | 778 c653 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am not sure if I regret not being in the Chamber when this was originally discussed, ...

Lord Stoneham of Droxford | 778 c653 (Link to this contribution)

So there is going to be a review. Does the Minister intend to implement the recommendations that ...

Lord Prior of Brampton | 778 c655 (Link to this contribution)

One cannot accept the recommendations until one has seen them. We will look at the review and mak...

Lord Whitty | 778 c655 (Link to this contribution)

Just to be clear, the Select Committee recommended a minimum of 12 months, subject to a consultat...

Lord Prior of Brampton | 778 c655 (Link to this contribution)

We did have a consultation, and it is true to say that our views and those of some of the trade u...

Back to top