Again, with respect to the noble Lord, I do not mind him speaking about the amendments; procedural matters are not for me, anyway. But he said, in effect, that the money being spent—whether that is £50 billion as my noble friend said or whatever—would be better spent on other things. That, I have to say, is a Second Reading speech, and the question, “Why are you spending money on this rather than that?” could be asked in either Chamber in relation to any matter under the sun. As for my noble friend’s contribution, while I had better be careful that I do not make a Second Reading speech myself, I am somewhat sick of hearing about the enormous damage that is being done to an area of natural beauty by a two-track railway line.
High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Snape
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 10 January 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
777 c69GC 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-12 15:13:57 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-10/17011088000089
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-10/17011088000089
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-10/17011088000089