I do not think that this debate can conclude without mention of Henry VIII. Repeatedly, some Members—certainly on my Benches—have complained about the overuse of Henry VIII clauses. Can the Government look more carefully at that? It is not only the use of them but the wording used; sometimes one can see the force of having a clause of that kind, but can find it is overdone. There is really a major issue here as to whether this should be properly controlled.
Strathclyde Review
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hope of Craighead
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 17 November 2016.
It occurred during Ministerial statement on Strathclyde Review.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
776 c1548 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-01-29 14:33:31 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-17/16111747000162
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-17/16111747000162
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-11-17/16111747000162