On the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Howarth—and I also apologise for not having been able to be here at Second Reading—I have every sympathy with the thrust of what the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, is saying. However, as I was listening to the discussion, it struck me that this Bill is intended to put on our domestic statute the provisions of the Hague convention, and it sits surrounded by a number of other Bills which relate to culture and crimes relating to culture. Surely the right answer is not to tamper with the interpretation of culture in the context of the Hague convention but to make sure that the definition of culture elsewhere on the statute book meets the requirements of the contemporary world.
Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Inglewood
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 June 2016.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Cultural Property (Armed Conflicts) Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
773 c1478 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-02-17 15:19:37 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-06-28/16062859000075
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-06-28/16062859000075
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-06-28/16062859000075