UK Parliament / Open data

Council Tax Valuation Bands Bill [HL]

Lords committee stage. Clause 1 agreed to. Clause 2, as amended, agreed to. Title agreed. Bill reported with amendment.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
771 cc871-884 
Session
2015-16
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Council Tax Valuation Bands Bill (HL) 2015-16
Monday, 1 June 2015
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord True | 771 c872 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord True

1: Clause 1, page 1, line 2, leave out subsection (1)

Lord True | 771 cc872-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in moving this amendment I should like to make two things absolutely clear. The first i...


Show all contributions (25)
Baroness D'Souza | 771 c874 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, if this amendment is agreed to, I cannot call Amendments 2, 3 and 4 by reason of pre-em...

Lord Marlesford | 771 cc874-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, my noble friend has made it clear that he does not like the Bill and would not wish it ...

Lord True | 771 c876 (Link to this contribution)

My noble friend raises a very important point. He says there will not be a lot of complications. ...

Lord Marlesford | 771 c876 (Link to this contribution)

Of course it does: it is the actual price paid. If somebody buys a house, they will know the band...

Lord True | 771 c876 (Link to this contribution)

Sorry, I was only seeking clarification and my noble friend has clarified it. Thank you.

Lord Marlesford | 771 c876 (Link to this contribution)

I want to say a word on the retrospection point. Recently, the Chancellor of the Exchequer reduce...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 771 c876 (Link to this contribution)

I was not planning to intervene in this debate and I very much support the position taken by the ...

Lord Marlesford | 771 c877 (Link to this contribution)

Of course there are two schedules: it is the whole purpose that properties migrate, when they cha...

Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 771 cc877-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this subject of property valuation has proved rather difficult over the years. I spent ...

Lord Skelmersdale | 771 c878 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am sure that my noble friend on the Front Bench does not want to get involved in this...

Lord Cormack | 771 cc878-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Marlesford has done a great service in bringing this matter to the...

Lord Butler of Brockwell | 771 c879 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support one of the main elements of the Bill of the noble Lord, Lord Marlesford—namel...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 771 cc879-880 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord True for his work on, and engagement with, this Bill. He h...

Lord True | 771 cc880-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to those who have spoken and to my noble friend on the Front Bench for th...

Lord Butler of Brockwell | 771 c881 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the noble Lord for giving way. I see the anomaly that he refers to. However, is ...

Lord True | 771 c881 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord makes a perfectly reasonable point. However, although you can appeal to the valuat...

Lord Marlesford | 771 c882 (Link to this contribution)

I do not think that any of us envisage a system in which each time people think the value of thei...

Lord True | 771 c882 (Link to this contribution)

No, but the noble Lord is replacing a system which is based on a consistent set of valuations wit...

Lord Marlesford | 771 c882 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the fact is that the council tax as originally devised is a progressive tax. There is n...

Lord True | 771 c883 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, there is a principle of progression: the landowner will have more dustbins than the per...

Lord Marlesford | 771 c884 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Marlesford

10: Clause 2, page 2, line 4, leave out “and Wales and Scotl...

Lord Marlesford | 771 c884 (Link to this contribution)

This amendment is merely technical. It was a mistake in the drafting of the Bill to apply it to S...

Baroness Stedman-Scott | 771 c884 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, if Amendment 10 is agreed to, I cannot call Amendment 11 by reason of pre-emption.

Back to top