My Lords, I am extremely grateful to the Minister. With her customary diplomacy and courtesy, she has given us about a quarter of a loaf. It may tend towards a third of a loaf, but not more than that. In effect, she has accepted the second element of Amendment 132. However, the issue of the determination being in regulations subject to parliamentary approval is serious. I was much fortified by the remark of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope of Craighead, who has immense experience and knowledge, about the possibility of protecting what was done from judicial review in a way that would happen if there were parliamentary approval. I hope the Minister will acquit me of any churlishness, but the remaining elements of Amendments 53 and 132 are important enough for us to test the opinion of the House on Amendment 53.
Housing and Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lisvane
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 13 April 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Housing and Planning Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
771 c284 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2019-10-02 12:37:53 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-04-13/16041337000162
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-04-13/16041337000162
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-04-13/16041337000162