UK Parliament / Open data

Housing and Planning Bill

Lords committee stage seventh day. Clauses 115 to 124 agreed to. Schedules 9 and 10 agreed to. Part 1 of 2.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
769 cc1940-1984 
Session
2015-16
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Procedure
New clauses
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Housing and Planning Bill 2015-16. Brought from the Commons
Wednesday, 13 January 2016
Bills
House of Lords
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee twentieth report.
Wednesday, 3 February 2016
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Housing and Planning Bill
Thursday, 17 March 2016
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Deposited Paper DEP2016-0341
Friday, 8 April 2016
Deposited papers
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Beecham | 769 c1941 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Beecham

82GD: Clause 115, page 52, line 30, at end insert—

“(c) p...

Lord Beecham | 769 cc1941-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, Section 225 of the Housing Act 2004 requires housing authorities to carry out an assess...


Show all contributions (80)
Bishop of St Albans | 769 cc1942-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment 82H, which has broad support across this House. This is a si...

Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville | 769 cc1945-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support the amendment and draw your Lordships’ attention to my entry in the Register ...

Baroness Whitaker | 769 cc1948-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I declare an interest as president of Friends, Families and Travellers. I am proud to a...

Lord Lansley | 769 cc1949-1951 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will briefly intervene in this debate. It is quite important when considering this is...

Baroness Whitaker | 769 c1951 (Link to this contribution)

Does the noble Lord accept that overall, nationally, there is a huge shortage of legitimate sites...

Lord Lansley | 769 c1951 (Link to this contribution)

I shall not comment on that. I am simply commenting on South Cambridgeshire where there is eviden...

Baroness Young of Old Scone | 769 c1951 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am afraid my experience in the adjacent county of Bedfordshire is different from that...

Lord Stunell | 769 c1952 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I apologise to the Committee for missing the first two or three minutes of the introduc...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 cc1952-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in debating this clause, I am conscious of the absence of the late Lord Avebury, which ...

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 769 cc1953-5 (Link to this contribution)

Will the Minister say a bit more about whether he sees this as a watering-down of the provisions?...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c1955 (Link to this contribution)

I understand the thinking behind the noble Lord’s question, but I might put it another way. He us...

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 769 c1955 (Link to this contribution)

If so, why is the change needed? Will the Minister tell us why things are not being left as they ...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c1955 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I made it clear at the beginning that this is to do with simplifying the legislation.

Lord Beecham | 769 c1955 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, by the standards of Committee stage on the Bill, this has been a relatively short debat...

Lord Lansley | 769 c1955 (Link to this contribution)

To be clear, yes, they acquired it, but at agricultural values. Then the utilities were provided ...

Lord Beecham | 769 c1956 (Link to this contribution)

Then that is a failure of the planning system, not of the particular requirements of this group. ...

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 769 c1956 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Kennedy of Southwark

83: Clause 116, page 53, line 19, at end insert—

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 769 cc1956-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, as this is my first proper intervention in today's proceedings, notwithstanding the que...

Lord Beecham | 769 c1957 (Link to this contribution)

Also, not very good for the Minister.

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 769 c1957 (Link to this contribution)

I agree entirely. It is not good for the Minister or indeed for all Members of your Lordships’ Ho...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 cc1957-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, Amendment 83, tabled by the noble Lords, Lord Kennedy and Lord Beecham, would require a...

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 769 c1958 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that explanation, which was very helpful. I will happily withd...

Lord Beecham | 769 c1958 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Beecham

84: Clause 117, page 54, line 18, leave out “as an alternative”...

Lord Beecham | 769 cc1958-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I suspect that this will be another very brief discussion. Schedule 9 amends the Housin...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c1959 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, Amendment 84, tabled by the noble Lords, Lord Kennedy and Lord Beecham, would make a ch...

Lord Campbell-Savours | 769 c1959 (Link to this contribution)

The Minister referred to reasonable fines. What scale of fines are we talking about here?

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c1959 (Link to this contribution)

I do not have details of the fines, but I shall be more than happy to write to the noble Lord wit...

Baroness Gardner of Parkes | 769 c1959 (Link to this contribution)

Could the Minister comment on whether this would cover the instances that I have spoken about of ...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c1959 (Link to this contribution)

I was answering the points raised by noble Lords, and the main point is that we think it dispropo...

Lord Campbell-Savours | 769 c1960 (Link to this contribution)

The Minister says that it is up to £30,000. There has been an interesting series of programmes re...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c1960 (Link to this contribution)

I wanted to expand on my previous answer to say that prosecution fines are unlimited civil penalt...

Lord Campbell-Savours | 769 c1960 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps I can pursue this a little further. How many people have actually been charged, nationall...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c1961 (Link to this contribution)

I can certainly offer a reply to the noble Lord. I hope that with the explanation that I have giv...

Lord Beecham | 769 c1961 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I confess that I am not at all satisfied with the Minister’s reply. We are seeing a cha...

Baroness Gardner of Parkes | 769 c1961 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Baroness Gardner of Parkes

84A: After Clause 118, insert the following new C...

Baroness Gardner of Parkes | 769 cc1961-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, my commercial interest is on the register. I have also owned a flat for 29 years, which...

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 769 cc1962-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the amendment proposed by the noble Baroness, Lady Gardner of Parkes, is excellent. As ...

Lord Campbell-Savours | 769 c1963 (Link to this contribution)

On Amendment 84B, what would happen? It talks about the information being made available to membe...

Lord Swinfen | 769 c1963 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, are there not already regulations about the overcrowding of buildings? I am sure that t...

Lord Campbell-Savours | 769 c1964 (Link to this contribution)

If there are such regulations in place, of which I am totally unaware, how many prosecutions have...

Earl of Lytton | 769 c1964 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, there are regulations about all these things. There are fire regulations, regulations o...

Lord Campbell-Savours | 769 c1965 (Link to this contribution)

Is there not great irony in the fact that, to get around this problem, we need more bedrooms? In ...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 cc1965-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lady Gardner of Parkes for her amendments, which seek to addres...

Lord Campbell-Savours | 769 c1966 (Link to this contribution)

Can the Minister put it on record that, when people buy their leases and turn them into a share o...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 cc1966-7 (Link to this contribution)

I note the noble Lord’s point but point out that the lease is a matter between the leaseholder an...

Baroness Gardner of Parkes | 769 c1967 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank those who have contributed to this debate, but I do not think that anyone has a...

Lord Campbell-Savours | 769 c1967 (Link to this contribution)

The holder of the freehold to whom those leases are transferred must comply with the original lea...

Baroness Gardner of Parkes | 769 c1967 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the noble Lord for that remark. I do not want to prolong the debate on this but I am cert...

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 769 c1967 (Link to this contribution)

On that very point, the noble Viscount, Lord Younger, said that councils can recover their expens...

Baroness Gardner of Parkes | 769 c1968 (Link to this contribution)

As we are not getting a reply on that point, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

Lord Young of Cookham | 769 c1968 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Young of Cookham

84BA: After Clause 122, insert the following new Claus...

Lord Young of Cookham | 769 cc1968-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment 84BA, which is in my name, and to Amendment 84G. These are, ...

Baroness Gardner of Parkes | 769 c1970 (Link to this contribution)

I shall be very brief: this amendment answers many of the points that I have raised and I strongl...

Earl of Lytton | 769 c1970 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Young of Cookham, has raised one of the legacy issues derived from...

Lord Campbell-Savours | 769 cc1970-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I would like to bring a little experience to this debate. I was involved in an enfranch...

Lord Berkeley | 769 cc1971-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 84D, which has been put in this group. I have no problem with...

Lord Beecham | 769 c1973 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the noble Viscount for giving way. I entirely endorse the amendments in the name of the n...

Lord Beecham | 769 c1973 (Link to this contribution)

I am so sorry, I thought it was in this group. Has it been degrouped?

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c1973 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps I could clarify for the noble Lord that we are speaking to Amendments 84BA, 84D and 84G.<...

Lord Beecham | 769 c1973 (Link to this contribution)

I apologise to the Committee. The group that I have includes the noble Baroness’s amendments. But...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 cc1973-4 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, and my noble friend Lord Young for their amendments. I wel...

Lord Campbell-Savours | 769 c1974 (Link to this contribution)

Going by my own experience, if a statutory requirement was placed on the management company to fo...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c1975 (Link to this contribution)

That is a possibility, and I will bring that into the considerations that we will undertake prior...

Lord Berkeley | 769 c1975 (Link to this contribution)

I am very grateful to the Minister for his answer, but in the exception mentioned—when properties...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c1975 (Link to this contribution)

I would not put it in quite that way. There are no plans to make changes, but the noble Lord will...

Lord Young of Cookham | 769 c1975 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to everybody who took part in this debate. In response to the noble Lord,...

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town | 769 cc1975-6 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town

84C: After Clause 124, insert the following ...

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town | 769 cc1976-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, Amendment 84C is about client money protection. It would require every letting agent to...

Lord Palmer of Childs Hill | 769 cc1977-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support the amendment, to which my name is attached. I declare my interest as chairma...

Lord Foster of Bath | 769 cc1979-1981 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support the amendment in the names of the noble Baroness, Lady Hayter, the noble Lord...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 cc1980-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it gives me considerable pleasure to be responding to the noble Baroness, Lady Hayter, ...

Lord Palmer of Childs Hill | 769 c1982 (Link to this contribution)

What is the Government’s logic? The Minster has said how good money protection schemes are, how e...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c1982 (Link to this contribution)

I appreciate that the noble Lord feels strongly about this, but as explained earlier, at the mome...

Lord Foster of Bath | 769 c1982 (Link to this contribution)

The Minister is suggesting that the introduction of measures proposed in this amendment would inc...

Viscount Younger of Leckie | 769 c1983 (Link to this contribution)

Yes, indeed. I shall make two points arising from the noble Lord’s question. We believe that the ...

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town | 769 cc1983-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the government Front Bench for allowing us to take this amendment at this stage...

Subjects
Back to top