UK Parliament / Open data

Immigration Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Rosser (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 March 2016. It occurred during Debate on bills on Immigration Bill.

Briefly, I am genuinely not clear what the problem is for the Government in accepting Amendment 116, which presumably would not involve large sums of money. As I understand it, it affects not people who have had their claims turned down and who have to leave the country, but people who receive a resident’s permit to remain in the country for differing reasons and differing periods of time. If it is the case that there is a gap between asylum support payments and mainstream payments, because matters are not all being dealt with within what is presumably the intended 28-day period, then, frankly, why not agree to the amendment? I hope that the Government will be able to give a helpful response to what, on the face of it, appears to be a pretty straightforward issue.

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
769 c1836 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Back to top